Skip to Content, Skip to Navigation
Advertisement

Safeguard OSH Solutions - Thomson Reuters

Safeguard OSH Solutions - Thomson Reuters



Accident Compensation Cases

Perkins v Accident Compensation Corporation (DC, 12/09/08)

Judgment Text

DECISION OF JUDGE M J BEATTIE 
Judge M J Beattie
[1]
The appellant lodged ten Notices of Appeal from decisions given by Reviewer, Mr M J Dunn, dated 2 August 2007, in respect of eleven applications for review which had been lodged by the appellant. All ten appeals have been given the reference number AI 329/07 by the Appeals Registry. 
[2]
The review applications to which the decisions sought to be appealed relate are respectively: 101935, 101934, 101938, 101940, 101947, 101949, 101950, 102910, 103215, 102124, 103215, 104023. 
[3]
In each of the ten decisions to which those eleven applications for review relate, the Reviewer ruled that he had no jurisdiction to consider the matter by reason of the application not relating to a reviewable decision within the meaning of Section 6 of the Act. 
[4]
Indeed, in some instances the Reviewer found that the application was a duplication of an earlier application for review. 
[5]
I have considered the review decisions now sought to be appealed and I determine that in each one of them the Reviewer has made the correct decision, he determining that there was no jurisdiction to consider the application for review by reason of that application not referring to a decision within the meaning of Section 6 of the Act. 
[6]
Finding as I have that all the review decisions were correct both in fact and law, the appeal to this Court relating to those decisions is dismissed. 

From Accident Compensation Cases

Table of Contents